Showing posts with label commodities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label commodities. Show all posts

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Wednesday Market Wrap

Another day of uncertainty and volatility.  The risks I listed yesterday were only compounded today leading to more risk shedding.  Until we see some resolution in Japan (and to a lesser extent the middle east), I don't see much of a rebound in risk.  That said, we might see some dip buying at some point.


Some economic and news review:


Home construction plunged 22.5% in February from January to a seasonally adjusted 479,000 homes. It was the lowest level since April 2009 and the second-lowest on records dating back more than a half-century.  Single-family homes fell 11.8% in February. Apartment and condominium construction dropped 47%.  Building permits fell 8.1% last month to the lowest level on records dating back to 1960. Permit requests for single-family homes saw the biggest decline. Apartments and condos remained flat.  This, when piled on the MBA data suggest housing isn't posting a sharp rebound (at least last month as the numbers are volatile).


The Labor Department on Wednesday said the producer price index jumped 1.6% last month, following increases of 0.8% in January and 0.9% in December. Producer prices have risen an unadjusted 5.6% over the past 12 months.  Core producer prices rose a much smaller 0.2%, but it was still the third straight monthly increase. Core prices have risen a much slower 1.8% over the past year. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch had predicted a 0.7 % increase in overall producer prices and a 0.2% increase in the core rate.  Inflation in the pipeline.  Stay close to home on the duration front and watch manufacturers for their ability to pass on price increases.

Reuters reported Wednesday that Patrick Parkinson, the director of the Federal's Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation, that although asset quality was "stabilizing," the banking system was "still in the repair and recovery stage." "Around 30 percent of all banks have less than satisfactory supervisory ratings," he is quoted as saying at the American Bankers Association annual government relations summit Washington, according to Reuters.  Great.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York bought $6.58 billion in Treasury debt on Wednesday, the latest operation of the Fed's second round of quantitative easing to support lending and spending. Dealers offered to sell the Fed $26.46 billion in debt maturing from 2015 to 2016.  $26B offered, $6.5B bought.  Gotta keep those rates down.


Fixed Income:

Another interesting day in the fixed income markets.  Housing numbers and increased risk overwhelmed the wholesale inflation numbers.

"Risk free" had another strong day as investors shed risk and bought govvies.  Seriously, Look at the long end.  Bets against the long end (like my TBT) are getting crushed.  Curve is flattening though.



Credit markets had a tough day (although trace hi/lo data would suggest otherwise).  Market traded down a bit with CDS ending at HV15 126/136 +5   IG15 91½/92 +3   HY15 101 9/16/101¾.


Cliffs, AGL and Teva were in the market.  Teva broke better, Cliffs broke wider and AGL broke tighter.


While CDS was wider, credit was up on the day using LQD as a proxy:






Equities:


Risk off!  Selloff continued.  Equities tanked mid-day but rebounded somewhat as conditions in Japan seemed to get better (debatable at best, but optimistic).


Not pretty for risk here in the states.




The sell-off was broad based, but conglomerates and tech got an extra bit of beating.  Personally think the drop in GE is overdone, but then again, I am long the name.




Global markets fared no better.


Commodities:


Commodities were mixed, but mostly down.  Gold came back as did silver and cotton got spanked.  I Don't expect much of a rebound in commodities until the damage in Japan is known and we start to get a feel for the global demand impact.




Currencies:


A decent spike in the Yen after a pretty dramatic sell-off.  Greenback is at a 15yr low vs the yen.








While the euro fell versus the dollar, it rebounded a bit late in the day.



Monday, January 3, 2011

Rare Earths - A Brief Summary and Focus Elements

I have occasionally written on rare earth elements and some of the factors influencing prices.  What I have never written is a background report on rare earths, the uses of them and market conditions.  Here is my attempt at rectifying that oversight as well as addressing those rare earths that I feel will offer the most upside potential.

There are many who currently believe that the rare earth market is super hot, on the verge of bubble. To this I offer the following:
  • One country controls the supply chain, and when that one country decides to tighten supplies (export quotas) while demand increases, price increases naturally follow.
  • While I believe that China is currently "flexing its muscle" with export quotas, and that these quotas will be loosened somewhat, China will be increasing domestic usage that will ultimately catch up with production capacity.
  • Given defense concerns (in the US and abroad), countries will be forced to diversify their raw material sources, leading to further development of non-Chinese mines and production facilities.
  • The lead time required to begin mine production is significant enough that demand will continue to outpace supply in the near-term. This will continue to drive prices of rare earth elements up until production capacity comes online.  
With that said, I continue.

Description

There are 17 rare earth elements (REEs), 15 within the chemical group called lanthanides, plus yttrium and scandium. The lanthanides consist of the following: lanthanum, cerium,
praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium,
dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium. Rare earths are moderately abundant in the earth’s crust, some even more abundant than copper, lead, gold, and platinum.

The lighter lanthanides, when compared with their heavy analogues, have an enhanced distribution in the crust. This crustal enrichment relative to the mantle is most pronounced for Lanthanum and tails off relatively smoothly towards Lutetium, the last member of the series. The light lanthanides are thus significantly more abundant than the heavies.

Rare-earths production is derived from the rare-earths ores bastnasite, monazite, xenontime, and ion-adsorption clay. Bastnasite is the world's principal source of rare earths and is produced in China and the United States. Significant quantities of rare earths are also recovered from the mineral monazite. Xenotime and ion-adsorption clays account for a much smaller part of the total production but are important sources of yttrium and other heavy-group rare earths.

In 1990, rare earths were produced by at least 14 countries. The United States was the largest rare-earths-producing country, followed by China, Australia, India, and Malaysia. Except for one primary mine in the United States, essentially all rare earths are produced as byproduct during processing for titanium and zirconium minerals, iron minerals, or the tin mineral cassiterite.


Location

Most rare earth elements throughout the world are located in deposits of the minerals
bastnaesite and monazite. Bastnaesite deposits in the United States and China account for the largest concentrations of REEs, while monazite deposits in Australia, South Africa, China, Brazil, Malaysia, and India account for the second largest concentrations of REEs.

Rare earth element reserves and resources are found in Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Missouri, Utah, and Wyoming. Heavy rare earth elements (HREEs) dominate in the Quebec-Labrador (Strange Lake) and Northwest Territories (Thor Lake) areas of Canada. There are high-grade deposits in Banyan Obo, Inner Mongolia, China (where much of the world’s REE production is taking place) and lower-grade deposits in South China provinces providing a major source of the heavy rare earth elements.  Areas considered to be attractive for REE development include Strange Lake and Thor Lake in Canada; Karonga, Burundi; and Wigu Hill in Southern Tanzania.  



End Uses

Clean energy technologies:  Lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, cobalt and lithium are used in electric vehicle batteries. Neodymium, praseodymium and dysprosium are used in magnets for electric vehicles and wind turbines. Samarium is also used in magnets. Lanthanum, cerium, europium, terbium and yttrium are used in phosphors for energy-efficient lighting. Indium, gallium and tellurium are used in solar cells.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) released a report examining the role of rare earth metals in clean energy based on data collected and research performed during 2010 . Its main conclusions include:
• Several clean energy technologies—including wind turbines, electric vehicles, photovoltaic cells and fluorescent lighting—use materials at risk of supply disruptions in the short term. Those risks will generally decrease in the medium and long term.
• Clean energy technologies currently constitute about 20 percent of global consumption of
critical materials. As clean energy technologies are deployed more widely in the decades
ahead, their share of global consumption of critical materials will likely grow.
Of the materials analyzed, five rare earth metals (dysprosium, neodymium, terbium,
europium and yttrium), as well as indium, are assessed as most critical in the short term. For this purpose, “criticality” is a measure that combines importance to the clean energy economy and risk of supply disruption.

Defense and military systems: The primary defense application of rare earth materials is their use in four types of permanent magnet materials commercially available: Alnico, Ferrites, Samarium Cobalt, and Neodymium Iron Boron. Neo magnets, the product derived from Neodymium Iron Boron, and Samarium Cobalt, are considered important to many defense products. They are considered one of the world’s strongest permanent magnets and an essential element to many military weapons systems.
Here is a brief summary:

Supply and Demand
World demand for rare earth elements is estimated at 134,000 tons per year, with global
production around 124,000 tons annually. The difference is covered by previously mined above-ground stocks. World demand is projected to rise to 180,000 tons annually by 2012, while it is unlikely that new mine output will close the gap in the short term. New mining projects could easily take 10 years to reach production. In the long run, however, the USGS expects that global reserves and undiscovered resources are large enough to meet demand.

The following is taken from the US DoE Critical Materials Strategy report dated December 2010 (full report here: DoE critical-materials-strategy well worth the read):
 

And the medium-term assessment:


What these graphs mean to me is that the rare earths that should be focused on are:  Dysprosium, Neodymium, Terbium, Europium and the quasi-rare earth Yttrium.

Future Production Potential

While given the current market for REE many companies are in the process of beginning or expanding REE production capacity, there are currently some companies with recognized (ie, on the map and feasible) plans for increased production of REEs.

Molycorp, which has an exploration program underway to further delineate its rare earth mineral deposits, has plans for full mine production in the second half of 2012 and has plans to modenize its refinery facilities. Molycorp’s Mountain Pass deposit contained an estimated 30 million tons of REE reserves and once produced as much as 20,000 tons per day. Mountain Pass cut-off grade (below which the deposit may be uneconomic) is, in some parts, 7.6%, while the average grade is 9.6%. U.S. Rare Earth (another U.S. based company), in the pre-feasibility stage of mine development, has long-term potential because of its large deposits in Idaho, Colorado, and Montana.

Canadian deposits contain the heavy rare earth elements dysprosium, terbium, and europium, which are needed for magnets to operate at high temperatures. Great Western Minerals Group (GWMG) of Canada and Avalon Rare Metals have deposits with an estimated high content (1%-2%) of heavy rare earth elements.  Avalon is developing a rare earth deposit at Thor Lake in the Northwest Territories of Canada. Drilling commenced in January 2010. Thor Lake is considered by some in the industry to contain one of the largest REE deposits in the world with the potential for production of heavy REEs.

GWMG owns a magnet alloy producer in the U.K. When GWMG begins production in Canada and elsewhere, they plan to have a refinery near the mine site allowing greater integration and control over the supply chain. Great Western’s biggest advantage could be its potential for a vertically integrated operation.  


Regulatory Sidebar

Rep. Mike Coffman (R-CO) made the following statement on the House Floor today during consideration of an amendment he has offered to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.  Coffman’s amendment, which builds on the GAO report he pushed for in last year’s defense bill, would require the Department of Defense to develop a plan for establishing a domestic rare earth magnet capability.  Rare earth magnets are currently used in many critical weapons systems:
“The Department of Defense is facing a near-term shortage of key “rare earth” materials necessary to support our defense weapon systems, and rare earth magnets are especially critical.  Currently, over 97% of rare earth production is controlled by China.”
“Today, the United States does not have a manufacturer of neodymium iron boron rare earth magnets, yet they are found in our precision guided munitions, ships, aircraft, and other critical weapons systems.”
“One key finding of the GAO report was their determination that some U.S. defense contractors are currently utilizing “neo” magnets from Chinese sources and incorporating them into the weapons platforms delivered to the Department of Defense.   At present, we have almost no alternatives to these Chinese components, as the United States is not currently producing these magnets.  Though America is not currently producing these magnets, we have the technological know-how to do so, combined with significant deposits of rare earths.”

This is a brief overview of the rare earth market, I hope it helps.  The next part of my analysis (due very soon) will focus on the firms that are involved in the mining and production of the critical rare earths identified earlier.

Monday, December 27, 2010

Corn - Highest and Best Use

Bloomberg story on ethanol following corn higher.  Imagine if people actually ate corn?  Could be inflationary.  Yep, great use of a staple crop.

(Bloomberg) -- Ethanol futures rose for the 13th straight day, reaching an eight-week high as more expensive corn signaled higher manufacturing costs for producers.
The biofuel followed corn higher on speculation that hot, dry weather in Argentina will harm crops. Corn is the primary ingredient used to produce ethanol in the U.S. One bushel distills into about 2.75 gallons of the gasoline additive.
“A lot of focus is on South American weather right now,” said Matt Janney, a trader at Citigroup Global Markets Inc. in Chicago. “If your input costs are going up, of course you want to get a higher price.”
Denatured ethanol for January delivery rose 1.3 cents, or 0.6 percent, to settle at $2.314 a gallon on the Chicago Board of Trade, the highest price since Nov. 9 and the longest streak of gains since Oct. 29, 2007. Futures have climbed 19 percent this year.
Corn futures for March delivery rose 1.25 cents, or 0.2 percent, to close at $6.1525 a bushel, the seventh straight gain. The commodity has gained 48 percent this year.
An average ethanol mill in Iowa is losing 4 cents on every gallon produced while an Illinois plant is earning a penny a gallon on a spot basis, according to Ag Trader Talk, an online grains information service in Clive, Iowa.

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

JPMorgan - Commodity King or Conspiracy theory

JP Morgan is having to deny that it has amassed 90% of copper stock warrants, following up on yesterday's denial of its silver position and the changes in its silver position.  Ultimately, it seems to be a search for the grand conspirator within the commodities markets.  I have a hard time believing that JPMorgan (read Jamie Dimon) is going to allow a significant net risk position in these two metals.



(Reuters) U.S. investment bank JPMorgan said it does not hold more than 90 percent of copper stock warrants in London Metal Exchange warehouses, but declined on Tuesday to comment on whether it had a smaller position.
A single holder, recently controlling 50-80 percent of copper stocks and cash contracts in London Metal Exchange warehouses, appears to have raised the position to above 90 percent, latest data from the world's biggest metals market showed.
A spokesman for JPMorgan, asked by Reuters to comment on the market talk, said the company did not hold more than 90 percent but declined to comment further. 
Reuters full article here:  Reuters JPM Copper





And yesterday's FT article:



JPMorgan has quietly reduced a large position in the US silver futures market which had been at the centre of a controversy about its impact on global prices for the precious metal.
The decision by JPMorgan was an attempt to deflect public criticism of the bank’s dealings in silver, a person familiar with the matter said. The person added that the bank’s position in silver would from now on be “materially smaller” than in the past.
However, JPMorgan said in a statement: “It is absolutely incorrect to say or imply that the Nymex, CFTC or any other exchange or regulator has instructed or asked us to reduce our position.” The bank declined to comment on whether it had reduced its position in the silver market.

Full FT article here: FT JPM Silver


Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Wednesday 12-01-2010 Recap - Risk On!

Ever see the Fantastic Four?  The human torch used to always say "Flame On!" and woosh, he was on fire.  Today we heard "Risk On!" and the market was on fire.  Why?

Ok, start with some decent economic news, ADP payrolls ahead of consensus (sounds good for NFP, right?).  From the release:

This month’s ADP National Employment Report shows an acceleration of employment and suggests the nation’s employment situation is brightening somewhat.  November’s gain in private-sector employment is the largest in three years.  This is the tenth consecutive month of gains, which have averaged 47,000 during that period.  Nevertheless, employment gains of this magnitude are not sufficient to lower the unemployment rate, which likely will remain above 9% for all of 2011.  Furthermore, given modest GDP growth in the second and third quarters, and the usual lag of employment behind GDP, it would not be surprising to see several more months of only moderate gains in employment even as the economic recovery gathers momentum.
Is this a nascent employment recovery taking hold?  I believe so.  Will it really move the needle?  I do not think it will for a while.  That said, the market is looking for reasons to rally, and this is giving it one.

Add in the perpetual EU comment and volatility:

(Bloomberg):  Trichet told the European Parliament late on Nov. 30 that some investors are underestimating governments’ determination to defend financial stability in the currency bloc.

(Bloomberg/BW): The EU's monetary affairs commissioner says measures like the weekend bailout of Ireland could pave the way for added steps from the European Central Bank to contain the continent's government debt crisis.  Olli Rehn says in a speech Wednesday that "these measures could provide a sound basis for the continuation of actions of stabilization by the ECB, which has played a key role in ensuring financial stability in the euro area, for instance last May."
(Reuters): European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said on Wednesday he had every confidence in the European Central Bank and was sure it would take whatever action is needed to protect euro zone stability.  "I am sure the ECB is analysing the current situation and that it will take the decisions necessary to guarantee the financial stability of the euro zone," Barroso said after attending a meeting in Brussels.
Whatta ya get:

And once again, the world is safe!  Place yer bets.

So, where was the equity action at (in the US)?


And what of the globe you ask:


Risk party like its 1999!

(looking for a better world snapshot page - suggestions????)

Did the re-risk trade extend to debt markets?


 Nope.

This was all about the lowest part of the capital structure, first loss and eternal duration.

Personally, I am not completely sold on the "risk on" trade, but who am I to fight it?  You know what they say about the collective wisdom of markets (or collective wisdom generally).

Treasuries got whacked, might want to start looking at long 10yr (let it get hit just a little more and start to leg back in).  Listen to the ECB to get EUR/USD direction (or market direction generally). Get out of the way of the A$, hearing fast money taking it off the table.  Large caps won the day, look for Mids to catch up and, as always, keep yer eyes on smalls.  Commodities doing well (ex-meats), let 'er ride.

And as always, be careful, make money and have fun (yeah, its possible).

About Me

A student of the markets that has held portfolio management, analysis and trading positions for over 15 years.